\documentclass[12pt]{article} \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e} \usepackage{principia} \usepackage{fullpage} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{setspace} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{graphicx} \begin{document} \title{Demonstration of Tests of Conversion of PM Dot Notation to Parentheses} \author{Dennis J. Darland} \maketitle ------------------------------------------------------- SECTION 0. VERIFICATION TESTS (of dot to paren dot icn) For each proposition is given: 1: the PM notation with dots. 2: the notation with parentheses 3: the Polish (with Lukasiewicz symbols) notation --------------------------------------------------------------- $\pmast 2 \pmcdot 06 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmimp q \pmdot \pmimp \pmdott q \pmimp r \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot p \pmimp r $ $\pmast 3 \pmcdot 47 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmimp r \pmand q \pmimp s \pmdot \pmimp \pmdott p \pmand q \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot r \pmand s $ $\pmast 4 \pmcdot 22 \pmthm \pmdott p \pmiff q \pmand q \pmiff r \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot p \pmiff r$ $\pmast 4 \pmcdot 41 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmdot \pmor \pmdot q \pmand r \pmdott \pmiff \pmdot p \pmor q \pmand p \pmor r$ $\pmast 4 \pmcdot 43 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmdot \pmiff \pmdott p \pmor q \pmand p \pmor \pmnot q$ $\pmast 4 \pmcdot 44 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmdot \pmiff \pmdott p \pmdot \pmor \pmdot p \pmand q$ $\pmast 4 \pmcdot 87 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmand q \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot r \pmdott \pmiff \pmdott p \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot q \pmimp r \pmdott \pmiff \pmdott q \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot p \pmimp r \pmdott \pmiff \pmdott q \pmand p \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot r$ $\pmast 4 \pmcdot 88 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmand q \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot r \pmdot \pmiff \pmdott p \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot q \pmimp r \pmdott \pmiff \pmdott q \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot p \pmimp r \pmdott \pmiff \pmdott q \pmand p \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot r$ $\pmast 5 \pmcdot 33 \pmthm \pmdottt p \pmand q \pmimp r \pmdot \pmiff \pmdott p \pmandd p \pmand q \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot r$ From Landon D. C. Elkind's Paper in Russell: Vol. 43, no. 1, page 44 $\pmast 431 \pmcdot 441 \pmthm \pmdot p \pmor q \pmdot \pmiff \pmdot r \pmimp s$ $\pmast 431 \pmcdot 442 \pmthm \pmdott p \pmdot \pmor \pmdot q \pmiff r \pmdott \pmimp \pmdott s$ $\pmast 431 \pmcdot 443 \pmthm \pmdott p \pmor q \pmdot \pmiff \pmdot r \pmdott \pmimp \pmdott s$ $\pmast 431 \pmcdot 444 \pmthm \pmdott p \pmdott \pmor \pmdott q \pmiff r \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot s$ $\pmast 431 \pmcdot 445 \pmthm \pmdott p \pmdott \pmor \pmdott q \pmdot \pmiff \pmdot r \pmimp s$ From same, page 54 $\pmast 431 \pmcdot 54 \pmthm \pmdott p \pmand q \pmandd r \pmand s \pmdott \pmimp \pmdott p \pmand s \pmandd r \pmand q $ check longer prop name % $\pmast 5 \pmcdot 33 \pmthm \pmdottt pabc \pmand qdef \pmimp rghi \pmdot \pmiff \pmdott pabc \pmandd pabc \pmand qdef \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot rghi$ Propositions involving quantifiers $\pmast 9 \pmcdot 2 \pmthm \pmdott \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot \pmpf{\psi} {y} $ $\pmast 9 \pmcdot 21 \pmthm \pmdottt \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmimp \pmpf{\phi}{x} \pmdot \pmimp \pmdott \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{x} $ $\pmast 9 \pmcdot 22 \pmthm \pmdottt \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmimp \pmpf{\phi}{x} \pmdot \pmimp \pmdott \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{x} $ $\pmast 9 \pmcdot 31 \pmthm \pmdottt \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{x} \pmdot \pmor \pmdot \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{x} \pmdott \pmimp \pmdot \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{x}$ $\pmast 9 \pmcdot 401 \pmthm \pmdotttt p \pmdott \pmor \pmdott q \pmdot \pmor \pmdot \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmdottt \pmimp \pmdottt q \pmdott \pmor \pmdott p \pmdot \pmor \pmdot \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} $ $\pmast 10 \pmcdot 35 \pmthm \pmdottt \pmsome{x} \pmdot p \pmand \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmdot \pmiff \pmdott p \pmandd \pmsome{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} $ $\pmast 11 \pmcdot 2 \pmthm \pmdott \pmall{x,y} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{[x,y]} \pmdot \pmiff \pmdot \pmall{y,x} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{[x,y]}$ One Step in proof of 11.55 I wanted example of 2 adjacent quantifiers - hard to find. $\pmast 11 \pmcdot 551 \pmthm \pmdottt \pmall{x} \pmdottt \pmsome{y} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmand \pmpf{\phi}{[x,y]} \pmdot \pmiff \pmdott \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmandd \pmsome{y} \pmdot \pmpf{\phi}{[x,y]} $ From same, page 46 $\pmast 431 \pmcdot46 \pmthm \pmdott \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmand \pmpf{\phi}{x} \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmpf{\psi}{x}$ Other Tests $\pmast 99 \pmcdot 99 \pmthm \pmdottt \pmnot \pmsome{x} \pmdott \pmnot \pmpf{\psi}{x} \pmdot \pmimp \pmdot \pmall{x} \pmdot \pmnot \pmpf{\psi}{x} $ \end{document}